In partnership with
The 10 Best AI Stocks to Own in 2026
AI is moving from experiment… to essential.
Every major industry is integrating it.
Every major company is investing in it.
By late 2025, AI was already an $800B market — growing at a pace that could push it well beyond $1 trillion in the years ahead.
Cloud infrastructure is scaling fast.
AI-enabled devices are multiplying.
Automation is becoming standard.
But here’s the real question…
When trillions flow into this transformation — which stocks stand to benefit most?
Our new report reveals 10 AI stocks positioned across the backbone of this shift — from the companies powering the infrastructure… to those embedding intelligence into everyday systems.
If you want exposure to one of the defining growth trends of this decade, start here.
Pattern of the Week
Australia's domain regulator, auDA, just voted to overhaul registration eligibility rules for .com.au, a namespace of 3.3 million domains. The board's change could strip eligibility from a million or more registrations. That's roughly 30% of the entire .com.au zone potentially facing forced drops or transfers, depending on how enforcement plays out.
This is not a fringe ccTLD story. .com.au is one of the most commercially active country-code extensions in the world, with genuine end-user demand from Australian businesses. Investors holding .com.au names as passive assets, particularly those registered on thin eligibility grounds, should treat this as a material portfolio risk, not a background regulatory footnote.
The broader lesson applies beyond Australia: ccTLD eligibility rules are policy decisions made by small boards, often with limited public notice, and they can move fast. Any position in a ccTLD that depends on a specific eligibility interpretation carries a category of risk that .com simply does not. Read our full breakdown of ccTLD eligibility risk and what it means for your portfolio →
From the Tool
We ran 408 appraisals this week across 10 TLDs, with no bulk runs in the mix.
.com dominated volume at 308 appraisals, 75% of the total. It also posted the strongest quick-sale-to-retail ratio on the platform: 54.7%, which is 7.8 percentage points above the platform-wide average of 46.9%. If liquidity is your primary concern, the data keeps pointing the same direction.
.ai continues to carry the highest median retail of any TLD we tracked, at $7,770 across 22 appraisals. That's 5.3x the .com median retail of $1,458. The quick-sale-to-retail ratio for .ai came in at 47.4%, close to the platform average, which suggests the market is pricing these names with reasonable bid-ask discipline rather than pure speculation.
The numbers worth sitting with are at the other end. .info and .xyz posted quick-sale-to-retail ratios of 8.4% and 9.6% respectively. The platform-wide ratio is 46.9%. That gap means a name our model values at $769 retail in .info is expected to fetch around $77 in a quick-sale scenario. For .xyz, a $1,451 retail estimate compresses to roughly $148 under the same conditions. .org and .net tell a similar story: median retail values nearly identical at $528 and $524, but both convert at less than half the platform-wide quick-sale ratio.
Liquidity discounts are not uniform across TLDs. This week's data makes that concrete.
Investor Plan — Unlimited Appraisals + Sale Reports $19/month for unlimited single-domain appraisals, unlimited Sale Reports, and bulk analysis up to 100 domains. No ads anywhere on the platform. Start your plan →
Reading From the Industry
Australian domain alert, DNW Podcast #603: Covers auDA's board vote to change .com.au registration eligibility rules, a change that could affect over a million domains in a namespace of 3.3 million.
WIPO panelist makes bonkers decision: Covers a UDRP dissent in the quobly.com case that, if its reasoning gained traction, would lower the bar for complainants filing against legitimately registered domains.
Hudson's Detroit developer tries to reverse hijack domain name: Covers the reverse hijacking finding against Bedrock Management Services, which filed a cybersquatting complaint over a domain registered before the company had trademark rights in the term.
One Tip
Before you auto-renew a batch of .xyz names, it's worth looking at what the TLD has actually produced.
.xyz launched in 2014 with considerable fanfare and has generated very few significant end-user sales relative to the volume investors are holding. The TLD is dominated by speculators selling to other speculators. End-user demand exists, but it's concentrated in crypto and Web3 projects. Outside that niche, renewal fees have a way of outpacing sale revenue over time.
Our own appraisal data this week puts the .xyz quick-sale-to-retail ratio at 9.6%, the second-lowest of any TLD we tracked. Sentiment on .xyz can shift, but the data has not shifted with it yet. That's worth factoring into your renewal decisions before the bill arrives.
A Portfolio Audit analyzes up to 25 domains with retail and quick-sale values, plus drop-or-hold recommendations across the whole set. Useful before renewal season.
Audit your portfolio →
Reply with thoughts, corrections, or a domain you want covered. I read every reply.